Ἀρχὴ τοῦ εὐαγγελίου Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ [υἱοῦ θεοῦ].

The use of the word “ευαγγέλιον” (euaggelion) establishes the genre of this narrative. Its purpose is not simply to provide historical information or a general record of events. Rather, the gospel’s documentation serves a deeper purpose: to affirm the anticipated “good news” that the people were waiting for. The focus is on the significance of the message itself, not just on the events described.

By introducing a “beginning” to the gospel narrative, the evangelist acknowledges the historical context that precedes his writing. This “beginning” represents a crafted starting point for understanding Jesus Christ, but it also points to a continuation of what is yet to be accomplished. In this sense, the evangelist is both introducing a new narrative and extending an existing historical trajectory.

The challenge of affirming Jesus Christ’s identity as the “Messiah” is a central task for the gospel writer. He recognizes the need to substantiate his claims, understanding that the credibility of the evidence he presents will shape future interpretations of the events he describes. Moreover, any reference to Old Testament prophecies cannot be made lightly. The absence of solid evidence would undermine the reliability of the gospel’s claims, and thus, the evangelist must ground his proclamations in a credible foundation. He is conscious of the historical continuity between past events and the future fulfilment of prophecies, emphasizing the weight and significance of both.

The evangelist then references Isaiah the prophet: “Καθὼς γέγραπται ἐν τῷ Ἠσαΐᾳ τῷ προφήτῃ” (“As it is written in Isaiah the prophet”). This introduces the idea that written human achievements, like prophecy, are confined by the time and place in which they are produced. The prophets, though inspired, often faced the frustration of waiting for their prophecies to be fulfilled. Their understanding of what is to come is pivotal, as it is rooted in their relationship with God. Yet, they are limited by the uncertainty of when and how their prophecies will come to pass. Both the prophets and their audience grapple with the tension between anticipation and realization.

Isaiah’s words, like other prophecies, are subject to the passage of time. The accuracy and truth of these prophecies are judged by their eventual fulfillment. The word “καθώς” (as) conveys a personal awareness that bridges the past and present. It signals a conscious intention to record events and prophecies, enabling future generations to interpret their significance. This connection between the past and the present allows for deeper understanding and insight into why these events are meaningful, both historically and theologically.

Isaiah 40:3